Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brightstar Logistics Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) [2010] FCA 435 Citation: Brightstar Logistics Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] FCA 435
Appeal from: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Parties: BRIGHTSTAR LOGISTICS PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
File number: NSD 565 of 2009
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2010
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – financial disclosure - application for financial disclosure exemption - lodgement – whether unreasonable burden – whether lodgement would provide relevant benefit – whether company exposed to burden or risk of substantial detriment – whether Tribunal erred when it affirmed ASIC's decision.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Ch 2M Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43
Cases cited: Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd v Wraith (1983) 48 ALR 500 Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Pochi (1980) 31 ALR 666 Sullivan v Department of Transport (1978) 20 ALR 323
Date of hearing: 23 and 24 November 2009
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 155
Counsel for the Appellant: J Simpkins SC with T Baw
Solicitor for the Appellant: Sydun & Co. Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: S Golledge
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Securities and Investments Commission
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate