Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maxim's Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450 Citation: Maxim's Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450
Parties: MAXIM'S CATERERS LIMITED v MAGNONA PTY LTD
File number(s): NSD 1475 of 2009
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 10 May 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – security for costs – entity incorporated in Hong Kong with no assets in Australia – O 28 r 3 Federal Court Rules – whether security for costs should relate to the costs of the proceeding or be restricted to the costs of enforcing judgment in Hong Kong
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 56 Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules Order 28 rule 3
Cases cited: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2009] FCA 1228 Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 DS Parklane Developments Pty Ltd v Korea First Finance Ltd (SCNSW, Santow J, unreported, 20 August 1997) Energy Drilling Inc v Petroz NL [1989] ATPR 40-954 Farmitalia Carlo Erba SrL v Delta West Pty Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 336 Fina Research SA v Halliburton Energy Services Inc [2002] FCA 1331 Logue v Hansen Technologies (2003) 125 FCR 590; [2003] FCA 81 Maxim's Caterers Ltd v Magnona Pty Ltd [2009] ATMO 98 MindShare Communications Ltd v Orleans Investments Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 521 PS Chellaram & Co v China Ocean Shipping Co (1991) 102 ALR 321
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate