Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rose on behalf of the Kurnai Clans v State of Victoria [2010] FCA 460 Citation: Rose on behalf of the Kurnai Clans v State of Victoria [2010] FCA 460
Parties: REGINA ROSE, DOT MULLETT, PAULINE MULLETT, FLO HOOD-FINN and FRANK HOOD ON BEHALF OF THE KURNAI CLANS v STATE OF VICTORIA & ORS
File number: VID 398 of 2005
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 14 May 2010
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – overlapping claims – issue of group composition – whether application as currently defined includes all persons who hold native title – Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) - effect of s 67(1)
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 67, 223, 225
Cases cited: Kokatha Native Title Claim v State of South Australia [2006] FCA 838 Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58; 214 CLR 422
Date of hearing: 12-14 December 2007, 20 December 2007, 31 January 2008, 6 February 2008, 14 February 2008, 19 February 2008, 11 March 2008, 5-9 October 2009, 12 October 2009
Date of last submissions: 12 February 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 208
Counsel for Applicant: Mr R. Skinner (12-14 December 2007, 20 December 2007, 31 January 2008, 6 February 2008, 14 February 2008, 19 February 2008, 11 March 2008)
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T. Neal SC & Mr P. Willis
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr T. Keely
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Victorian Government Solicitors Office
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate