Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCA 481 Citation: Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCA 481
Parties: DARRYL PETER JONES v AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
File number: QUD 115 of 2010
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 18 May 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to appeal – application for leave to appeal – application for stay of orders pending appeal – principles relevant to leave to appeal – whether decision attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration – exercising judicial discretion – whether substantial injustice would result if leave to appeal were refused – principles relevant to granting an extension of time to appeal – whether "special reasons" demonstrated TRADE PRACTICES – applicant engaged in practices purported to resolve life-threatening diseases such as cancer – representations made on applicant's website – alleged misleading or deceptive representations – whether orders the subject of appeal are ultra vires the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – powers of the Court in granting interim injunctions – s 6(3), s 80(2) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – principles in Foster v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2006) 149 FCR 135 – whether interim injunction should be confined to conduct involving use of "postal, telegraphic or telephonic services" Held: the notice of motion filed 9 April 2010 by Darryl Peter Jones be dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 6, 80 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 10(2A)(b)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate