Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOAK v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 489 Citation: SZOAK v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 489
Appeal from: SZOAK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 104
Parties: SZOAK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 345 of 2010
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 21 May 2010
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 25(2), 25(2B)(bb)(ii), 25(2BA) Federal Court Rules O 35A r 2(1)(f), O 35A r 3(1)(a)
Date of hearing: 17 May 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
No appearance for the applicant
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 345 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZOAK
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: KATZMANN J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 MAY 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) or alternatively O 35A rr 2(1)(f) and 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $1,614.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate