Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 516 Citation: Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 516
Parties: PIVOTEL SATELLITE PTY LIMITED, PIVOTEL GROUP PTY LIMITED and PIVOTEL COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED v OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED and OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 1468 of 2009
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 27 May 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for leave to file amended statement of claim - whether pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action - whether pleading causes embarrassment - leave not granted
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Federal Court Rules O 11 r 16
Cases cited: Banque Commerciale SA en Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409; [1999] FCA 1101 Murex Diagnostics Australia Pty Ltd v Chiron Corp (1995) 55 FCR 194 Pancontinental Mining Ltd v Posgold Investments Pty Ltd (1994) 121 ALR 405 Re Kernel Holdings Pty Ltd v Rothmans of Pall Mall (Australia) Pty Ltd [1991] FCA 417 Re Tooth & Co Ltd; Re Tooheys Ltd (1979) 39 FLR 1 Singapore Airlines Limited v Taprobane Tours WA Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 158
Date of hearing: 21 May 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate