Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alstom Limited v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company [2010] FCA 588 Citation: Alstom Limited v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company [2010] FCA 588
Parties: ALSTOM LIMITED (ACN 000 038 237) v LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY (ARBN 086 083 605), ALLIANZ AUSTRALIA INSURANCE LIMITED (ACN 000 122 850), ACE INSURANCE LIMITED (ACN 001 642 020), CATLIN SYNDICATE LIMITED (ACN 108 319 786) and TOKIO MARINE EUROPE
File number: WAD 300 of 2008
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 11 June 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – O 15 r 11 of the Federal Court Rules – whether document within the power of a party – third party claimed document was confidential.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37P Federal Court Rules O 15 r 11
Cases cited: Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 627 Taylor v Santos Ltd (1998) 71 SASR 434 Sabre Corporation Pty Ltd v Russ Kalvin's Hair Care Company (1993) 46 FCR 428
Date of hearing: 22 April 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 37
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr CG Colvin SC
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Cocks Macnish
Counsel for the Defendants: Mr GR Hancy and Mr EM Davies
Solicitor for the Defendants: Blackstone Waterhouse Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
in admiralty
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 300 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate