Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hu v Giles [2010] FCA 592 Citation: Hu v Giles [2010] FCA 592
Appeal from: Hu v Giles [2010] FCA 174
Parties: YUAN YUAN HU v CHRISTINE GILES and COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN
File number(s): QUD 60 of 2010
Judges: SPENDER J
Date of judgment: 3 June 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appeal from interlocutory decision of single judge sitting in the appellate jurisdiction – whether the grant or refusal of extension of time is an exercise of appellate jurisdiction – s 25 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 2AA, O 52 r 18(1)
Cases cited: Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 47 Thomas Borthwick & Sons v the Trade Practices Commission (1988) 18 FCR 424 Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1516
Date of hearing: 3 June 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant (respondent on the Motion) appeared in person
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor (applicant on the Motion)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 60 of 2010
BETWEEN: YUAN YUAN HU
Applicant
AND: CHRISTINE GILES
First Respondent
COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate