Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rusina Mining NL, in the matter of Rusina Mining (No 2) [2010] FCA 609 Citation: Rusina Mining NL, in the matter of Rusina Mining NL [2010] FCA 609
Parties: RUSINA MINING NL ACN 009 242 451
File number: WAD 79 of 2010
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 14 June 2010
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application pursuant to s 411 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for approval of scheme of arrangement
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 105, s 249HA(1), s 249J(1), s 249J(3)(d), s 411(4)(b), s 411(17), s 412(1), s 412(6), s 1322(1), s 1322(2) Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2000 (Cth) O 1, r 3(2) Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)
Cases cited: Re Alabama, New Orleans and Pacific Junction Railway Co [1891] 1 Ch 213 Re Central Pacific Minerals NL [2002] FCA 239 Re Coles Group (No 2) [2007] VSC 523; 65 ACSR 494 Re Mirvac Ltd (1999) 32 ACSR 107 Re Rusina Mining NL [2010] FCA 517 Re Solution 6 Holdings Ltd (2004) 50 ACSR 113
Date of hearing: 14 June 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr MJ Feutrill with Mr MR Hawtin
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Steinepreis Paganin
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 79 of 2010
IN THE MATTER OF RUSINA MINING NL ACN 009 242 451 RUSINA MINING NL ACN 009 242 451
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate