Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Casey v DePuy International Limited [2010] FCA 617 Citation: Casey v DePuy International Limited [2010] FCA 617
Parties: PAMELA JOAN CASEY v DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON MEDICAL PTY LTD
File number: ACD 10 of 2010
Judge: STONE J
Date of judgment: 15 June 2010
Legislation: Companies Act 2006 (UK) s 1139(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Part IVA Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 4 Federal Court Rules O 8 r 3(2) and (3)
Date of hearing: 15 June 2010
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Solicitor for the Applicant: R Montagnino, United Legal
Solicitor for the First Respondent: No appearance
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: T Biddle, Norton Rose Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION ACD 10 of 2010
BETWEEN: PAMELA JOAN CASEY
Applicant
AND: DEPUY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
First Respondent
JOHNSON & JOHNSON PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 JUNE 2010
WHERE MADE: CANBERRA
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Pursuant to Order 8 rule 3(2), the applicant has leave to serve an originating application on the first respondent, DePuy International Limited by registered post to St Anthony's Road, Beeston, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS11 8DT. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate