Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Robertson v Knott Investments Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 619 Citation: Robertson v Knott Investments Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 619
Appeal from: Robertson v Knott Investments Pty Ltd [2010] FMCA 142
Parties: KARL VERNON ROBERTSON v KNOTT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
File number: NSD 321 of 2010
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 17 June 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – stay of order for payment of costs – balance of convenience – stay refused
Cases cited: Robertson v Knott Investments Pty Ltd [2010] FMCA 142, cited
Date of hearing: 10 June 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr A Britt
Solicitor for the Appellant: Michael Atkinson & Associates
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr R Crow
Solicitor for the Respondent: Workplace Law
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NSW DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 321 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: KARL VERNON ROBERTSON
Appellant
AND: KNOTT INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: FLICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 JUNE 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Notice of Motion as filed on 1 June 2010 is dismissed. 2. The Applicant on the Motion, Mr Robertson, is to pay the costs of the Respondent. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate