Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Badcock v Pirie Street Holdings Limited [2010] FCA 628 Citation: Badcock v Pirie Street Holdings Limited [2010] FCA 628
Appeal from: Badcock v Adelaide Bank Limited & Anor [2010] FMCA 35
Parties: ROBERT JOHN BADCOCK v PIRIE STREET HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 061 461 550) (FORMERLY ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED) and BENDIGO AND ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED (ACN 068 049 178)
File number: SAD 17 of 2010
Judge: LANDER J
Date of judgment: 25 June 2010
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – appeal from orders made by a Federal Magistrate dismissing the appellant's application to set aside a creditor's petition – appeal incompetently brought – sequestration order against the appellant had not been discharged – the appellant was an undischarged bankrupt
Legislation: Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) s 104 Financial Sector (Business Transfer and Group Restructure) Act 1999 (Cth) s 22
Cases cited: Badcock v Pirie Street Holdings Limited [2010] FCA 627, referred to
Date of hearing: 18 May 2010
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A Robertson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Piper Alderman
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION SAD 17 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: ROBERT JOHN BADCOCK
Appellant
AND: PIRIE STREET HOLDINGS LIMITED (ACN 061 461 550) (FORMERLY ADELAIDE BANK LIMITED)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate