Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Uen v Honeywell Limited [2010] FCA 634 Citation: Uen v Honeywell Limited [2010] FCA 634
Parties: HENRY UEN v HONEYWELL LIMITED (ACN 000 646 882)
File number: NSD 385 of 2010
Judge: FLICK J
Date of judgment: 18 June 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – transfer to Federal Magistrates Court – transfer on initiative of the Court – discretion
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 32AB, s 37M Federal Court Rules, O 62 r 36A, O 82 r 7
Cases cited: Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187, 69 NSWLR 558, cited Garry Rogers Motors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 903, (1999) ATPR 41-703, cited Kheir's Financial Services Pty Ltd v Aussie Home Loans Ltd [2008] FCA 1602, cited Koutouvas v Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust) Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1125, cited N. A. Retail Solutions Pty Ltd v St George Bank Ltd [2010] FCA 259, cited Quinn v Jack Chia (Australia) Ltd [1992] 1 VR 567, cited Sagacious Legal Pty Ltd v Lumley General Insurance Ltd t/as Lumley Special Vehicles [2009] FCA 763, cited
Date of hearing: 18 June 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr M Gillis, Gillis Delaney Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr P Almond, DibbsBarker Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NSW DISTRICT REGISTRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate