Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tisdall v Webber (No 2) [2010] FCA 650 Citation: Tisdall v Webber (No 2) [2010] FCA 650
Parties: PETER THOMAS TISDALL v DR TONY WEBBER, GWEN ASTEN, TIM FLANAGAN, PAUL HANSON, MEDICARE AUSTRALIA and DETERMINING AUTHORITY
File number(s): VID 580 of 2009
Judge: RYAN J
Date of judgment: 25 June 2010
Date of hearing: 15 March 2010
Date of last submissions: 4 and 11 June 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Dr J Bleechmore
Solicitor for the Applicant: Coulter Roache Lawyers
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION VID 580 of 2009
BETWEEN: PETER THOMAS TISDALL
Applicant
AND: DR TONY WEBBER
First Respondent
GWEN ASTEN
Second Respondent
TIM FLANAGAN
Third Respondent
PAUL HANSON
Fourth Respondent
MEDICARE AUSTRALIA
Fifth Respondent
DETERMINING AUTHORITY
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 June 2010
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the application herein, such costs to be taxed in default of agreement.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate