Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZNZK v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 651 Citation: SZNZK v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2010] FCA 651
Appeal from: SZNZK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 186
Parties: SZNZK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 333 of 2010
Judges: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 24 June 2010
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Visas – Protection visas – Decision of delegate of the Minister – Reasons – Premised on material submitted by another unrelated applicant – Decision reviewable by the Refugee Review Tribunal – Applicant denied two merits-based decisions – No jurisdictional error by Tribunal
Legislation: Constitution s 75(v) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 25 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 411, 414, 418, 425, 476
Cases cited: Applicant S1693 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 1512 applied Collector of Customs (NSW) v Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd (1979) 41 FLR 338 applied Evans v State of New South Wales [2008] FCAFC 30 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Ahmed (2005) 143 FCR 314 cited SZGME v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 168 FCR 487 cited SZNZK v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 186 affirmed Re the Honourable Justice Sir Gerard Brennan; Ex parte Muldowney (1993) 67 ALJR 837 cited The King v Murray and Cormie; Ex parte The Commonwealth (1916) 22 CLR 437 cited Uddin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 149 FCR 1 cited Zubair v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 139 FCR 344 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate