Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bradken Resources Pty Ltd (ACN 098 300 988) v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (ACN 059 949 469) [2010] FCA 662 Citation: Bradken Resources Pty Ltd (ACN 098 300 988) v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (ACN 059 949 469) [2010] FCA 662
Parties: BRADKEN RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 098 300 988) v LYNX ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PTY LTD (ACN 059 949 469)
File number: WAD 212 of 2009
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 24 June 2010
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patents – appeal and cross-appeal in the Federal Court from final determination of the Commissioner's delegate – issues to be determined on appeal – whether arguments raised in appeal of original decision can be agitated on appeal from final determination where no appeal from amendment decision – subject matter of appeal – additional evidence of prior art – characterisation of appeals from the Commissioner in the Federal Court – hearing de novo – whether appeals should be consolidated
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 18, 40, 59, 60, 102, 104 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 22(1), O 58 r 5A
Cases cited: Airsense Technology Ltd v Vision Systems Ltd (2007) 73 IPR 65 Bradken Resources Pty Ltd v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 586 Bradken Resources Pty Ltd v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd (2008) 78 IPR 586 Bradken Resources Pty Ltd v Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd [2009] APO 15 EI du Pont de Nemours & Company v ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd (2003) 128 FCR 392 Iluka Midwest Ltd v Technological Resources Pty Ltd (2002) 116 FCR 218 Jafferjee v Scarlett (1937) 57 CLR 115 Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp v The Reynolds Metal Co (1969) 120 CLR 136 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited [2007] FCA 578 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited (No 2) (2007) 163 FCR 372 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group [2008] FCA 555 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 2) [2009] FCA 363 Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 3) [2010] FCA 32 New England Biolabs Inc v F Hoffmann-La Roche AG (2004) 141 FCR 1 Perkin-Elmer Corporation v Varian Techtron Pty Ltd (1985) 5 IPR 321 Re Smith; Ex p Mole Engineering Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 340
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate