Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 685 Citation: Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Axis International Management Pty Ltd (No 4) [2010] FCA 685
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v AXIS INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
File number: WAD 157 of 2008
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 21 June 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – parties' representation – corporate respondent seeks leave to be represented other than by a solicitor under Order 4 r 14(2) Federal Court Rules – where proposed representative legally qualified but bankrupt – leave granted.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules Order 4 r 14(2)
Cases cited: Australian Communications Authority v Viper Communications Pty Ltd (2000) FCA 982 cited Molnar Engineering Pty Ltd v Burns (1984) 3 FCR 68 cited Oakley Inc v Franchise China Pty Ltd (2002) FCA 404 cited Termi Mesh Australia Pty Ltd v Josu Manufacturing Pty Ltd (1999) FCA 1241 applied
Date of hearing: 21 June 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Ms W Gillan
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Blake Dawson Waldron
Counsel for the Fifth Defendant : Mr G Hill (appeared with leave)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 157 of 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate