Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Madsen v Power (No 2) [2010] FCA 686 Citation: Madsen v Power (No 2) [2010] FCA 686
Parties: SARA MADSEN (NEE POPE) v FIONA POWER and SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 12 of 2010
Judge: SPENDER J
Date of judgment: 1 July 2010
Cases cited: Cilli v Abbott (1981) 53 FLR 108 cited Latoudis v Casey (1990) 97 ALR 45 considered Re Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13 cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 18 June 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 22
Solicitor for the Applicant: McCullough Robertson
Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 12 of 2010
BETWEEN: SARA MADSEN (NEE POPE)
Applicant
AND: FIONA POWER
First Respondent
SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 JULY 2010
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be no order as to costs. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION QUD 12 of 2010
BETWEEN: SARA MADSEN (NEE POPE)
Applicant
AND: FIONA POWER
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate