Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 15) [2010] FCA 697 Citation: Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 15) [2010] FCA 697
Parties: SPORTSBET PTY LTD v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, RACING NEW SOUTH WALES and HARNESS RACING NEW SOUTH WALES
File number(s): NSD 1821 of 2008
Judges: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 2 July 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Amendment – Post-judgment but before the perfection of orders – Whether amendment merely encapsulated an issue which had arisen between the parties at trial – Insufficient evidence to support this conclusion
Legislation cited: Racing Administration Act 1998 (NSW) s 33
Cases cited: Banque Commerciale SA en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 applied Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1990) 169 CLR 436 cited Sportsbet Pty Ltd v New South Wales [2010] FCA 604 cited Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 3) [2009] FCA 1248 cited Sportsbet Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (No 11) [2010] FCA 59
Date of hearing: 1 July 2010
Date of last submissions: 1 July 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate