Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network G.P. [2010] FCA 703 Citation: Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network G.P. [2010] FCA 703
Parties: FOOD CHANNEL NETWORK PTY LTD (ACN 079 015 339) v TELEVISION FOOD NETWORK G.P.
File number(s): QUD 388 of 2008
Judges: GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 5 July 2010
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – consideration of an appeal by the trade mark owner from a decision of the Registrar to remove a trade mark from the register on the ground of non‑use – consideration of s 92(4)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) - consideration of whether the trade mark owner has used the mark in relation to the services for which it is registered – consideration of the meaning to be attributed to the services as specified
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth), ss 17, 20, 20(2), 27(1), 27(3), 92(1), 92(4)(b), 120(1)
Cases cited: N.V. Sumatra Tobacco Trading Company v British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited [2008] FCA 1542 - cited Blount Inc. v Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 83 FCR 50; 40 IPR 498 - cited Soncini v Registrar of Trade Marks (2001) 109 FCR 548 51 IPR 411 - cited Ostrowski‑Meissner v Registrar of Trade Marks (2006) 69 IPR 291 – cited Health World Ltd v Shin‑Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 13 – cited and quoted Daiquiri Rum Trade Mark [1969] RPC 600 – cited and quoted Ritz Hotel v Charles of the Ritz (1987) 12 IPR 417 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate