Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Xu v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) [2010] FCA 729 Citation: Xu v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) [2010] FCA 729
Parties: JOHN XU v ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (RMIT)
File number: VID 439 of 2010
Judge: GOLDBERG J
Date of judgment: 8 June 2010
Legislation: Federal Court Rules: O 54 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth): ss 3(1), 3(2)
Date of hearing: 8 June 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondent: P G Liondas
Solicitor for the Respondent: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION VID 439 of 2010
BETWEEN: JOHN XU
Applicant
AND: ROYAL MELBOURNE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (RMIT)
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 JUNE 2010
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application filed on 7 June 2010 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's cost of and incidental to the application.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION VID 439 of 2010
BETWEEN: JOHN XU
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate