Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hoop & Javelin Holdings Limited v BT Projects Pty Limited (In Liq) (No 6) [2010] FCA 742 Citation: Hoop & Javelin Holdings Limited v BT Projects Pty Limited (In Liq) (No 6) [2010] FCA 742
Parties: HOOP & JAVELIN HOLDINGS LIMITED (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN MALTA) v BT PROJECTS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 097 995 698), INTABILL, INC (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS), DANIEL KIM TZVETKOFF and SALVATORE SCIACCA
File number: NSD 597 of 2009
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 25 June 2010
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 82 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 51A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Federal Court Rules O 35A r 2(2), O 35A r 3(2)
Date of hearing: 25 June 2010
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Solicitor for the Applicant: Norton Rose Australia
Solicitor for the Third Respondent: No appearance by or on behalf of Mr Tzvetkoff
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 597 of 2009
BETWEEN: HOOP & JAVELIN HOLDINGS LIMITED (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN MALTA)
Applicant
AND: BT PROJECTS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 097 995 698)
First Respondent
INTABILL, INC (A COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS)
Second Respondent
DANIEL KIM TZVETKOFF
Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate