Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ibarcena v Huang S & W Pty Ltd t/as Woden Dental Care [2010] FCA 752 Citation: Ibarcena v Huang S & W Pty Ltd t/as Woden Dental Care [2010] FCA 752
Parties: JEREMY PATRICK IBARCENA v HUANG S & W PTY LTD T/AS WODEN DENTAL CARE, WEN ZHANG, ROGER GLAVE MENDELSON and HAROLD NYMAN
File number: NSD 98 of 2010
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 13 July 2010
Catchwords CONTRACT – agreement to provide dental services – whether the applicant was liable to first respondent for the cost of such services – whether respondent agreed to bulk bill – whether the applicant was bound by an issue estoppel TRADE PRACTICES – whether the dental services were unsolicited – whether the first respondent engaged in unconscionable conduct – whether first respondent made false or misleading representations
Legislation: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008 (ACT) s 22 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) s 3C(1) Trade Practices Act 1974(Cth) ss 4, 51AB, 53, 63A, 64, 75AZQ, 75AZC, 82, Part IV, Div 1 Health Insurance (Dental Services) Determination of 2007
Cases cited: Cachia v Isaacs (1985) 3 NSWLR 366 followed Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 253 ALR 324 cited Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate