Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hepburn v Teplitzky [2010] FCA 801 Citation: Hepburn v Teplitzky [2010] FCA 801
Parties: IAIN MACGREGOR HEPBURN AND PETER TERENCE CLARKE v DAVID RAYMOND TEPLITZKY
File number: WAD 111 of 2009
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 24 February 2010
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 17
Cases cited: Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129
Date of hearing: 24 February 2010
Date of last submissions: 23 February 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Hawkins
Solicitor for the Applicants: Corser & Corser
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms PM Sibtain
Solicitor for the Respondent: Kemp Strang
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 111 of 2009
BETWEEN: IAIN MACGREGOR HEPBURN AND PETER TERENCE CLARKE
Applicants
AND: DAVID RAYMOND TEPLITZKY
Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 FEBRUARY 2010
WHERE MADE: sydney
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants' notice of motion dated 27 November 2009 is dismissed.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 111 of 2009
BETWEEN: IAIN MACGREGOR HEPBURN AND PETER TERENCE CLARKE
Applicants
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate