Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hepburn v Teplitzky (No 2) [2010] FCA 802 Citation: Hepburn v Teplitzky (No 2) [2010] FCA 802
Parties: IAIN MACGREGOR HEPBURN AND PETER TERENCE CLARKE v DAVID RAYMOND TEPLITZKY
File number: WAD 111 of 2009
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 29 July 2010
Catchwords: COSTS – contempt of court – applicants sought production of computer hard drives by respondent in aid of their application that respondent be held in contempt of court – application dismissed – whether the application for production of the hard drives was continued in wilful disregard of well-established law – whether applicants should pay indemnity costs.
Cases cited: Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129 Hepburn v Teplitzky [2010] FCA 801 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federation Union of Workers, Western Australian Branch (No 2) (1993) 46 IR 301 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 R v The Associated Northern Collieries (1910) 11 CLR 738 Smith v Read 1 Atk 526
Date of last submissions: 2 March 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 111 of 2009
BETWEEN: IAIN MACGREGOR HEPBURN AND PETER TERENCE CLARKE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate