Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Boost Tel Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 829 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Boost Tel Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] FCA 829
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v BOOST TEL PTY LIMITED (ACN 092 384 417) and PREPAID SERVICES PTY LIMITED (ACN 094 689 219)
File number: WAD 125 of 2009
Judge: SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 19 July 2010
Date of hearing: 19 July 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr W Keane
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Ms J Kroll
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Minter Ellison
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 125 of 2009
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: BOOST TEL PTY LIMITED (ACN 092 384 417)
First Respondent
PREPAID SERVICES PTY LIMITED (ACN 094 689 219)
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 19 JULY 2010 WHERE MADE: PERTH
by consent the court declares that:
PPS Declarations 1. Pre-paid Services Pty Ltd (PPS), from at least January 2008 until 31 July 2009, in trade or commerce:
(a) engaged in conduct that was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of section 52(1) of the Act;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate