Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZODC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 840 Citation: SZODC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 840
Appeal from: SZODC & Anor v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2010] FMCA 326
Parties: SZODC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 584 of 2010
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 10 August 2010
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth),ss 91R, s 442B
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte H [2001] HCA 28 SZODC v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship & Anor [2010] FMCA 326
Date of hearing: 6 August 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Appellant: Appellant appeared in person assisted by an interpreter
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Baird
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 584 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZODC
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BROMBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 AUGUST 2010
WHERE MADE: Melbourne (heard in SYDNEy)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate