Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Coutsournas v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] FCA 899 Citation: Coutsournas v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2010] FCA 899
Parties: PETER COUTSOURNAS v COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA (ACN 123 123 124)
File number: VID 463 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 20 August 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary disposal under Federal Court Rules O 20 r 5 – consideration of when jurisdiction to dismiss a proceeding for abuse of process should be exercised – previous applications at Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal unsuccessfully pursued based on substantially similar allegations to those in current proceeding – allegations of statutory contraventions not coherently developed and did not found sustainable cause of action – no indication the applicant suffered any loss or damage by reason of alleged conduct – proceeding vexatious and an abuse of process – proceeding dismissed
Legislation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 12GF Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1041(I) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth), O 20 r 5 Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) s 75(1)(a)
Cases cited: Australian Building Industries Pty Limited v Stramit Corporation Limited [1997] FCA 1318 Chu Sing Wun v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 47 ALD 538 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 Dow Hager Lawrance v Lord Norreys (1890) 15 App Cas 210 Roser v Immigration Review Tribunal (No 2) (1992) 29 ALD 182 Shumack v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police [2005] FCA 1476
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate