Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kakavas v Paradise Enterprises Limited [2010] FCA 915 Citation: Kakavas v Paradise Enterprises Limited [2010] FCA 915
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Kakavas v Paradise Enterprises Limited [2010] FMCA 574
Parties: HARRY KAKAVAS v PARADISE ENTERPRISES LIMITED
File number(s): VID 610 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 25 August 2010
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for leave to appeal from Federal Magistrate's decision to refuse extension of time for compliance with bankruptcy notice pursuant to s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act – application heard together with grounds of appeal - whether applicant's insolvency may be a relevant consideration – whether specific prejudice would be suffered by applicant were application refused – whether complexity of applicant's estate may be relevant consideration – in absence of demonstrable error by Federal Magistrate the discretion to extend time not is to be re-exercised by Federal Court – application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 40, 41, 115, 116 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25
Cases cited: Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1994) 217 ALR 251 considered, applied Byron v Southern Star Group Pty Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 264 cited, applied Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied Guss v Johnstone (2000) 171 ALR 598 referred House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 applied Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited [2010] VSCA 102 cited Kakavas v Paradise Enterprises Ltd [2010] FMCA 574 referred Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 applied Paradise Enterprises Inc v Kakavas [2010] VSC 25 referred Re Nguyen; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 54 FCR 403 cited, applied Re Taylor; Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1983) 74 FLR 377 applied Warner v Frost [1999] FCA 830 referred
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate