Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Futuris Corporation Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 935
Citation: Futuris Corporation Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 935
Parties: FUTURIS CORPORATION LIMITED ACN 004 336 636 v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File numbers: SAD 110 of 2005; WAD 153 of 2003
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 31 August 2010
Catchwords: TAXATION — appeal under s 14ZZ of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) against appealable objection decision by Commissioner in relation to amended assessment — capital gains realised on sale by holding company of shares in wholly owned subsidiary — transactions prior to sale involving holding company and subsidiaries which engaged Part IIIA Division 19A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) so as to transfer cost base from taxpayer's investment in one subsidiary to taxpayer's investment in company to be sold — Commissioner decides that transactions result in a reduction in capital gains realised on sale and the obtaining of a tax benefit — whether applicant obtained a tax benefit in connection with a scheme under ss 177C(1) and 177D(a) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) — whether persons who entered into the scheme did so for purpose of obtaining a tax benefit in connection with the scheme under s 177D(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)
HELD: Applicant did not obtain tax benefit in connection with a scheme within ss 177C(1) and 177D(a) because if scheme had not been entered into or carried out applicant would, as a matter of reasonable expectation, have carried out sale in accordance with transactions where alleged tax benefit would not have been included in its assessable income. Commissioner's assessment was therefore excessive.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate