Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Abbott GMBH & Co. KG v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 940 Citation: Abbott GMBH & Co. KG v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 940
Parties: ABBOTT GMBH & CO. KG and ABBOTT AUSTRALASIA PTY LTD (ACN 000 180 389) v APOTEX PTY LTD (ACN 096 916 148)
File number: VID 796 of 2009
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 2 September 2010
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Patent – Validity – Whether invention anticipated by prior art – In absence of disclosure in terms, whether compound the subject of the patent would inevitably have been derived by following instructions in prior art – Construction of prior art document – Whether different meanings reasonably conveyed INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Patent – Validity – Whether invention involved an inventive step when measured against prior art base as at priority date – Whether skilled worker would have considered formation of patented compound to be the obvious solution to problem presented by prior art INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Patent – Validity – Whether invention a manner of manufacture – Whether compound the subject of the invention would come into existence in natural course INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Patent – Validity – Whether patent obtained by false suggestion – Whether amendments made to satisfy examiner, and represented as making a material difference to previous meaning of claims and specification, made no difference at all INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Patent – Infringement – Consistency of compound with patentee's claims determined by measuring water content – Relevance of deviations observed on measurement – Whether deviations took compound outside claims in patent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate