Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 2) [2010] FCA 982 Citation: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jutsen (No 2) [2010] FCA 982
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION & CONSUMER COMMISSION v LUALHATI JUTSEN, TINA AROHA BROWNLEE and DAVID GRAEME SCANLON
File number: NSD 529 of 2010
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 9 September 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by Applicant for leave to amend statement of claim and application after evidence closed – considerations relevant to exercise of the Court's discretion – leave to amend granted
Legislation: Court Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT) R 21 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules O 13 r2 (2) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 6, 65AAB, 65AAC, 65AAD
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University(2009) 239 CLR 175 considered/applied Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jutsen [2010] FCA 961 cited
Date of hearing: 30 August 2010 – 3 September 2010, 7 September 2010
Date of last submissions: 7 September 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 26
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr S. White SC and Mr T. Brennan
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 529 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate