Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sportingbet Australia Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [2010] FCA 1022 Citation: Sportingbet Australia Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [2010] FCA 1022
Parties: SPORTINGBET AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 092 468 883) v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES, RACING NEW SOUTH WALES (ABN 86 281 604 417) and HARNESS RACING NEW SOUTH WALES (ABN 16 962 976 373)
File number: NSD 869 of 2010
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 16 September 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay or adjournment of proceeding pending outcome of appeals in separate proceedings Held: adjournment granted.
Legislation: Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp) Constitution, s 109 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 91(1) Northern Territory (Self-Government) Act 1978 (Cth), s 49 Racing Administration Act 1998 (NSW), ss 33 and 33A Racing Administration Regulation 2005 (NSW)
Cases cited: Betfair Pty Ltd v Racing New South Wales [2010] FCA 603 Betfair Pty Ltd v Racing New South Wales (No 14) [2010] FCA 696 Breen v Sneddon (1961) 106 CLR 406 Campaign Master (UK) Ltd v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (No 4) (2010) 269 ALR 76 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 5) (2005) 216 ALR 147 Spencer Motors Pty Ltd v LNC Industries Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 921 Sportsbet Pty Ltd v New South Wales [2010] FCA 604 Tamawood Ltd v Habitare Developments Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 364 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (1989) 88 ALR 90
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate