Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mercland Investment Group Pty Ltd v Duncalm Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1027 Citation: Mercland Investment Group Pty Ltd v Duncalm Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1027
Parties: MERCLAND INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LIMITED ACN 119 224 556 v DUNCALM PTY LIMITED ACN 086 114 552, STEPHEN MATTHEW JONES, FRAZER ROBERTS and ROBERT LEIGH RAMPTON
File number: NSD 1949 of 2008
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2010
Date of hearing: 4 August 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr D McLure
Solicitor for the Applicant: McLachlan Thorpe Partners
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S Golledge
Solicitor for the Respondents: Hunt & Hunt
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1949 of 2008
BETWEEN: MERCLAND INVESTMENT GROUP PTY LIMITED
ACN 119 224 556
Applicant
AND: DUNCALM PTY LIMITED
ACN 086 114 552
First Respondent
STEPHEN MATTHEW JONES
Second Respondent
FRAZER ROBERTS
Third Respondent
ROBERT LEIGH RAMPTON
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: EDMONDS J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 SEPTEMBER 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The motion be dismissed. 2. The respondents pay the applicant's costs of the motion, as taxed or agreed. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate