Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Brookfield Multiplex Limited (No 4) [2010] FCA 1029 Citation: P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Brookfield Multiplex Limited (No 4) [2010] FCA 1029
Parties: P DAWSON NOMINEES PTY LTD and FREDERICK HENRY HART v BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX LIMITED and BROOKFIELD MULTIPLEX FUNDS MANAGEMENT LIMITED
File number: VID 1380 of 2006
Judge: FINKELSTEIN J
Date of judgment: 21 September 2010
Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDING – approval of settlement – factors to be considered – disproportionate payment to class members – payment for applicants' time and expenses – solicitors restrained from acting against respondents in future litigation
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33V
Cases cited: Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v International Litigation Funding Partners Pte Ltd (2009) 180 FCR 11 CSR v Rothfield (unreported, Hedigan J, SC of Vic, 3 April 1992) Darwalla Milling Co Pty Ltd v F Hoffman-La Roche (No 2) (2006) 236 ALR 322 Dorajay Pty Ltd v Aristocrat Leisure Ltd [2009] FCA 19 Ingot Capital Investments Pty Ltd v Macquarie Equity Markets Ltd (2008) 73 NSWLR 653 Williams v FAI Home Security Pty Ltd (No 5) [2001] FCA 399
Date of hearing: 21 July 2010
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicant: N C Hutley SC and M B J Lee
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate