Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CMA Corporation Ltd v Rowe [2010] FCA 1042 Citation: CMA Corporation Ltd v Rowe [2010] FCA 1042
Parties: CMA CORPORATION LIMITED, CMA RECYCLING PTY LTD and CMA RECYCLING (VIC) PTY LTD v DOUGLAS TREVOR ROWE, SOUTHERNRO PTY LTD, JASON ZORZUT, TROY ROWE, GARY COSTELOW, MALCOLM MCLEAN and DARYL WHITE
File number: NSD 1102 of 2010
Judge: BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 23 September 2010
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – privilege – inadvertent disclosure of privileged material – timely attempt to retrieve material inadvertently disclosed – no waiver of privilege
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 122(2), 122(3)
Cases cited: Boensch v Pascoe [2007] FCA 532 Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth) v Kane (1997) 140 FLR 468 Goldberg v Ng (1994) 33 NSWLR 639 Kabwand Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 85 Mann v Carnell (1999) 201 CLR 1 Meltend Pty Ltd v Restoration Clinics of Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 511 Unsworth v Tristar Steering and Suspension Australia Ltd [2007] FCA 1081
Date of hearing: 22 September 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 32
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr R. Cobden SC with Mr C. Colquhoun
Solicitor for the Applicants: Minter Ellison
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A. I. Tonking SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Madgwicks Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1102 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate