Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bioprospect Ltd v Solagran Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1097 Citation: Bioprospect Ltd v Solagran Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 1097
Parties: BIOPROSPECT LTD ACN 008 130 336 v SOLAGRAN LTD ACN 002 592 396, VAGIF SOULTANOVICH SOULTANOV, DENIS BERTRAM KILROY, NOVA VITA PTY LTD ACN 109 436 508 and CUMPUTERSHARE INVESTOR SERVICES PTY LTD ACN 078 279 277
File number: WAD 234 of 2010
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 11 October 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motion to amend statement of claim – motion to strike out statement of claim – prejudice to the respondents – arguable cause of action disclosed
Cases cited: Bioprospect Ltd v Solagran Ltd [2010] FCA 1081 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494
Date of hearing: 6 October 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: T Coyle with A Rumble
Solicitor for the Applicant: Lavan Legal
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents: MD Wyles SC with B Murphy
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents: Foster Nicholson Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION WAD 234 of 2010
BETWEEN: BIOPROSPECT LTD ACN 008 130 336
Applicant
AND: SOLAGRAN LTD ACN 002 592 396
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate