Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 4) [2010] FCA 1114 Citation: Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group (No 4) [2010] FCA 1114
Parties: LYNX ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PTY LTD (ACN 059 949 469) v THE ANI CORPORATION LIMITED TRADING AS ANI BRADKEN RAIL TRANSPORTATION GROUP (ACN 000 421 358), BRADKEN RESOURCES PTY LTD (ACN 098 300 988), BRADKEN LIMITED (ACN 108 693 009) and WORLEYPARSONS SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 001 279 812)
File number: WAD 219 of 2006
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 14 October 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to administer interrogatories – O 16 of the Federal Court Rules – interrogatories sufficiently confined
Cases cited: Austal Ships Pty Ltd (ACN 079 160 679) v Incat Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 051 556 855) (No 3) [2010] FCA 795
Date of hearing: 29 September 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: JJ Garnsey QC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Karp Steedman Ross-Adjie
Counsel for the First Respondent: JA Campbell
Solicitor for the First Respondent: DLA Phillips Fox
Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents: P Clay
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate