Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mani v Burness [2010] FCA 1132
Citation: Mani v Burness [2010] FCA 1132
Appeal from: Transcrete Aust Pty Ltd v Mani & Anor [2010] FMCA 434
Parties: REYHAN MANI v PAUL ANDREW BURNESS, MORGAN GERARD JAMES LANE and TRANSCRETE (AUST) PTY LTD (ACN 007 448 035)
File number: VID 538 of 2010
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 21 October 2010
Corrigendum: 4 November 2010
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – appeal against sequestration order – whether Federal Magistrate erred - issue of appropriate forum to hear factual dispute in relation to order – whether appellant's solvency relevant to determination of factual dispute – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 153B
Cases cited: Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (unreported, Beaumont J, 18 October 1984) Govedarica v Jovanovich [1998] FCA 463 referred Re Frank; Ex parte Piliszky (1987) 16 FCR 396 referred Re James; Ex parte Carter Holt Harvey Roofing (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 51 FCR 14 referred Re Schmidt; Ex parte Anglewood Pty Ltd (1968) 13 FLR 111 referred Re Sleiman; Ex parte Sleiman; Dojif Pty Ltd [1984] (unreported, Davies, Lockhart and Neaves JJ, 15 September 1987) Re Sterling; ex parte Esanda Limited (1980) 44 FLR 125 referred Rigg v Baker [2006] FCAFC 179 cited SZDGC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1638 cited Transcrete Aust Pty Ltd v Mani & Anor [2010] FMCA 434 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate