Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited (No 9) [2010] FCA 1165 Citation: Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited (No 9) [2010] FCA 1165
Parties: MEDIA OCEAN LIMITED, MEDIATEL AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and SOUND ADVERTISING LIMITED v OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 242 of 2009
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 27 October 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend application and statement of claim
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules
Cases cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175; [2009] HCA 27 Cement Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 101 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 118 Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2009] FCA 1601 Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 121 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Proprietary Limited (1981) 147 CLR 589
Date of hearing: 26 October 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr F KunÇ SC and Mr C Bova
Solicitor for the Applicants: Marque Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr RG McHugh SC and Mr JAC Potts
Solicitor for the Respondent: Minter Ellison Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate