Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1177
Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1177
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 1157 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 29 October 2010
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Advertising
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 55, 57 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Pt IXC, ss 52, 53(aa), 55A, 80
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Boost Tel Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 701 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Star Promotions Club Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 139 cited Bayside City Council v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 595 cited Chappell v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1984] Aust Tort Reports 80-691 cited Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 cited Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd (2007) 242 ALR 586 cited Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 205 ALR 402 cited Singtel Optus v Telstra [2004] FCA 859 cited St Lukes Health Insurance v Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd (1995) 17 ATPR 41-428 cited Tec & Thomas (Australia) Pty Ltd v Matsumiya Computers Co Pty Ltd (1984) 1 FCR 28 cited Trade Practices Commission v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (1996) 64 FCR 326 cited Westpac Banking Corporation v Northern Metals Pty Ltd (1989) 14 IPR 499 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate