Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Day v Mercedes-Benz Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1183 Citation: Day v Mercedes-Benz Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1183
Parties: GRAEME DAY, FYSHWICK PROPERTIES PTY LTD and CANBERRA STAR MOTORS PTY LTD (IN LIQ) v MERCEDES-BENZ AUSTRALIA PACIFIC PTY LTD
File number: NSD 800 of 2008
Judge: STONE J
Date of judgment: 1 November 2010
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 62 r 15
Cases cited: Brimaud v Honeysett Instant Print Pty Ltd (1988) 217 ALR 44 Woods v Walsh (1989) 22 FCR 204
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 22 October 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicants: J Lazarus
Solicitor for the Applicants: C G Gillis & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: D R Pritchard SC
Solicitor for the Respondent: Robinson Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 800 of 2008
BETWEEN: GRAEME DAY
First Applicant
FYSHWICK PROPERTIES PTY LTD
Second Applicant
CANBERRA STAR MOTORS PTY LTD (IN LIQ)
Third Applicant
AND: MERCEDES-BENZ AUSTRALIA PACIFIC PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 1 NOVEMBER 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The third applicant's application for a variation of the costs order made on 8 May 2009 is dismissed. Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate