Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nokia Corporation v Millaras (No 2) [2010] FCA 1217
Citation: Nokia Corporation v Millaras (No 2) [2010] FCA 1217
Parties: NOKIA CORPORATION v RENAE MILLARAS
File number(s): NSD 1352 of 2010
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 4 November 2010
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – interlocutory injunction – prima facie case of infringement – goods seized by Australian Customs Service bearing a mark substantially identical or deceptively similar to the applicant's trademark – injunction restraining Australian Customs from releasing the seized goods to the respondent.
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 4 November 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms G Rubagotti
Solicitor for the Applicant: Baker & McKenzie Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1352 of 2010
BETWEEN: NOKIA CORPORATION
Applicant
AND: RENAE MILLARAS
Respondent
JUDGE: JAGOT J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 NOVEMBER 2010
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
On the applicant, through its counsel, giving the usual undertaking as to damages, the Court: 1. Orders that, until further order, pursuant to s. 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), any publication of confidential exhibit KJT-2 to the affidavit of Kenneth James Taylor sworn 2 November 2010, including publication to the respondent and the Australian Customs Service, is forbidden. 2. Orders that, until further order of the Court, the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service be restrained from releasing to the respondent, goods bearing: (a) one or more of: (i) Australian registered trade mark 458364 NOKIA in class 9; and (ii) Australian registered trade mark 867057 NOKIA in class 9, (Registered Trade Marks); or (b) any mark which is substantially identical with or deceptively similar to any one or more of the Registered Trade Marks, which goods are the subject of, and referred to in, the Notification of Seizure to Objector dated 13 September 2010 and marked with the Australian Customs Service file number 2010/042036 (Seized Goods). 3. Orders that, until further order of the Court, the respondent, by herself, her servants, her agents or otherwise, be restrained from collecting the Seized Goods from the Australian Customs Service. 4. Orders that, until further order of the Court, the respondent, by herself, her servants her agents or otherwise, be restrained from: (a) manufacturing; (b) importing; (c) causing or procuring the manufacture or importation of; (d) selling or offering or exposing for sale; (e) advertising or promoting; or (f) otherwise providing, goods bearing one or more of: (i) the Registered Trade Marks, or (ii) any mark which is substantially identical with or deceptively similar to any one or more of the Registered Trade Marks. 5. Directs that these orders be entered ex parte and forthwith. 6. Directs the applicant to notify the respondent of these orders and the date of the next directions hearing by sending an email attaching a copy of the orders as entered to the email addresses the subject of order 3 of the Court made 25 October 2010 by 4pm today. 7. Directs the applicant to notify the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service of these orders and provide a copy of the orders as entered by 4pm today. 8. Orders that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the application today, and costs of and incidental to the application made on 25 October 2010, as agreed or taxed. 9. List the proceedings for directions before Jagot J at 9.30 am on 18 November 2010.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate