Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1226
Citation: Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1226
Parties: PIVOTEL SATELLITE PTY LIMITED, PIVOTEL GROUP PTY LIMITED and PIVOTEL COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED v OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED and OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 1468 of 2009
Judge: JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motionto amend application and statement of claim
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Media Ocean Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited (No 9) [2010] FCA 1165 Pivotel Satellite Pty Limited v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2010] FCA 516 State of Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd [1999] ATPR 41-691; [1999] FCA 499
Date of hearing: 8 November 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr J Halley SC and Mr C Arnott
Solicitor for the Applicants: Marque Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr C Moore and Mr JAC Potts
Solicitor for the Respondents: Minter Ellison Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1468 of 2009
BETWEEN: PIVOTEL SATELLITE PTY LIMITED
First Applicant
PIVOTEL GROUP PTY LIMITED
Second Applicant
PIVOTEL COMMUNICATIONS PTY LIMITED
Third Applicant
AND: OPTUS MOBILE PTY LIMITED
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate