Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wills v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2010] FCA 1227
Citation: Wills v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (No 3) [2010] FCA 1227
Parties: ANDREW C WILLS v AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
File number: WAD 370 of 2006
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 11 November 2010
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10, 22(4), 89, 90, 98(2), 195AA, 195AC, 195AF, 195AI, 195AL, 195AR(1), (3), 195AS(1), (3), 134(1) Copyright Amendment (Film Directors' Rights) Act 2005 (Cth)
Cases cited: Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (in liq) (2007) 157 FCR 564cited Bailey v Namol Pty Ltd (1994) 53 FCR 102cited Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658 cited George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64 cited Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298cited Merlet v Mothercare plc (1984) 2 IPR 456cited Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 cited Wills v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2009) 253 ALR 228cited
Date of hearing: 1-4 June, 6-7 July 2010
Date of last submissions: 7 July 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 108
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B H Taylor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Talbot Olivier
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate