Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reynolds v JP Morgan Administrative Services Australia Ltd [2010] FCA 1243
Citation: Reynolds v JP Morgan Administrative Services Australia Ltd [2010] FCA 1243
Parties: KYLIE REYNOLDS v JP MORGAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AUSTRALIA LIMITED and BRIAN JOHNSON
File number: NSD 1325 of 2010
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 29 October 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – confidentiality orders – principles of open justice – alleged unlawful discrimination – question whether attachments to Form 167 filed in accordance with O 81 r 5 of the Federal Court Rules are documents open for public inspection within O 6 r 6(2)(a) or (c), or are documents for which leave to inspect is required under O 46 r 6(4)
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)s 46PO Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 29 October 2010
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Solicitor for the Applicant: MD Harmer of Harmers Workplace Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: K Eastman
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Allens Arthur Robinson
Counsel for the Second Respondent: J Trew
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Toomey Pegg
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1325 of 2010
BETWEEN: KYLIE REYNOLDS
Applicant
AND: JP MORGAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AUSTRALIA LIMITED
First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate