Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1272
Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1272
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LTD
File number(s): NSD 1157 of 2010
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 19 November 2010
Catchwords: TRADE PRACTICES – Misleading and deceptive conduct – Remedies – Non-punitive orders – Corrective Advertising – Appropriate media – s 86C Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 55A, 80, 86C Trade Practices Bill 1974 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1177 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1200 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute (WA) Inc (1999) 95 FCR 114 cited Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45 cited Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 cited Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Cassidy (2003) 135 FCR 1 cited Tec & Thomas (Australia) Pty Ltd v Matsumiya Computers Co Pty Ltd (1984) 1 FCR 28 cited Telstra Corporation Ltd v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (1996) 36 IPR 515 cited
Date of hearing: 5 November 2010
Date of last submissions: 5 November 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate