Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOLC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 1285
Citation: SZOLC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 1285
Appeal from: SZOLC v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FMCA 640
Parties: SZOLC v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1154 of 2010
Judge: DODDS-STREETON J
Date of judgment: 23 November 2010
Catchwords: MIGRATION – first respondent's delegate refuses to grant appellant a protection (Class XA) visa – appeal from Federal Magistrate's decision dismissing application for review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal, affirming the delegate's decision – whether the Tribunal erred in concluding reasonable to relocate in Thailand – whether Tribunal failed to take into account relevant considerations and took into account irrelevant considerations – whether grounds of appeal were deficient in form – whether new ground of appeal‑whether reasonable prospects of success – factors taken into account ‑ appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Iyer v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1788 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 NAJT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2005) 147 FCR 51 Randhawa v Minister for Immigration (1994) 52 FCR 437 SZATV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 233 CLR 18 SZKCQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 578 SZMIP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 217 VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate