Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International BV [2010] FCA 1293
Citation: Federal Treasury Enterprise (FKP) Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits International BV [2010] FCA 1293
Parties: FEDERAL TREASURY ENTERPRISE (FKP) SOJUZPLODOIMPORT and FEDERAL PUBLIC UNITARY ENTERPRISE EXTERNAL ECONOMIC UNION SOJUZPLODOIMPORT (FGUP VO) v SPIRITS INTERNATIONAL BV (REGISTERED IN THE NETHERLANDS) (COMPANY NO. 27178367)
File number: NSD 1816 of 2004
Judge: EDMONDS J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2010
Catchwords: PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – whether the Court should, as a matter of discretion in the cause of efficient case management, make orders for the decision of questions separately before any trial pursuant to O 29 r 2 of the Federal Court Rules (Cth).
Held: The four questions moved on by the cross-claimants should be determined separately.
Legislation: Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) ss 88, 89 Federal Court Rules (Cth) O 29 r 2
Cases cited: A/S D/S Svendborg v Wansa [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep 183 referred to Attorney-General (UK) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30referred to Betfair Pty Ltd v Racing New South Wales (No 14) [2010] FCA 696 referred to Boele v Norsemeter Holding AS [2002] NSWCA 363referred to Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 174 FCR 175 referred to CEO of Customs v Au [2005] NSWCA 119 referred to Commonwealth v Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 322 referred to Desert Sun Loan Corp v Hill [1996] 2 All ER 847referred to Dissidomino v Butcher Paull & Calder [2004] WASC 122referred to DSV Silo-und Verwaltungsgesellschaft GmbH v Owners of The Sennar (No 2) [1985] 1 WLR 490referred to EI du Pont de Nemours & Co v Imperial Chemical Industries plc (2007) 163 FCR 381referred to Evans & Associates v Citibank Ltd [2003] NSWSC 204 referred to Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd (2008) 75 IPR 478 referred to Kemeny v Kemeny [1998] FamCA 34 referred to Kuppers v New South Wales Fire Brigades [2005] NSWSC 193 referred to Landmark Building Developments Pty Ltd v Toyama Pty Ltd [2004] NSWSC 1103 referred to Lewis v Nortex Pty Ltd (in liq) [2002] NSWSC 124 referred to Linprint Pty Ltd v Hexham Textiles Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 508 referred to Minero Pty Ltd v Redero Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Santow J, 29 July 1998) referred to Murakami v Wiryadi (2010) 268 ALR 377referred to National Commercial Bank v Wimborne (1978) 5 BPR 11,958 (NSW) referred to OAO Plodovaya Kompaniya v Russia [2007] ECHR 460 referred to Olbers v Commonwealth (No 3) [2003] FCA 651referred to Paramasivam v Flvnn (1998) 90 FCR 489 referred to Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 75 referred to S.P.I. Spirits (Cyprus) Ltd v Diageo Australia Ltd (No 2) (2006) 155 FCR 150referred to Spencer v Commonwealth [2008] FCA 1256 referred to Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130referred to Tiufino v Warland (2000) 50 NSWLR 104 referred to United States Surgical Corp v Hospital Products International Pty Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 766 referred to Whiteley-Bond v Abletts Transport Pty Ltd [2009] ACTSC 81 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate