Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 1406 Citation: Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 1406
Parties: RUSSELL DOCTOR AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE BIGAMBUL PEOPLE v STATE OF QUEENSLAND AND OTHERS
File number: QUD 101 of 2009
Judge: COLLIER J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2010
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – notice of motion to replace Applicant in application for determination of native title – s 66B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – authorisation meeting voted to replace Applicant – whether authorisation meeting properly conducted – whether will of authorisation meeting corrupted by activities of individuals wanting current applicant replaced – whether those in attendance at authorisation meeting were members of the claim group – whether those in attendance at the authorisation meeting were representative of the claim group – whether replacement applicant required to be representative of composition of claim group – whether replacement applicant was less representative than current applicant Held: order made to replace Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate